President to Indulge in Deadly Recreational Substance

Dated: 30 Jul 2009
Posted by Tanya

If you are anything like me, you are sick to death of this Gates arrest BS. Just in case you were living under a rock and didn’t hear about this story, read this. In order to calm racial tensions caused by this arrest, the President is going to host a beer summit with the Harvard professor and the arresting officer. I know, I know, I am sick of reading about this crap too. I only revived my dead blog to point out, once again, that people can indulge in a dangerous, recreational substance that causes many overdose deaths every year and nobody bats an eyelash. But could you imagine what would happen if the President decided to go with a much Safer alternative? No pot for the president, the prof and the po-po, that’s for sure!

How Do You Grow a Drug?

Dated: 16 Jul 2009
Posted by Tanya

That is the question that popped into my head as I read yet another scandalous story about a celebrity that enjoys marijuana. This time it was one of the actors in the Harry Potter series, 19 year old Jamie Waylett who was growing it. Smart fellow, that Jamie Waylett. It is no secret to readers of this blog that I think the marijuana laws are useless and stupid and should be immediately repealed. However, I wrote this post because of the wording of the article. Just check this out:

Jamie Waylett pleaded guilty to growing the drug during a hearing Thursday at City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court.

Excuse me, but how do you go about growing a drug? That’s like telling a barley farmer that they are growing beer. You grow plants, not drugs. But since the only processing that marijuana requires is that the buds get dried after they get harvested, it is understandable why some people would think that this is appropriate language. I know that it takes a lot to go from barley to beer bottle but marijuana is pretty much done once the buds are clipped and dried.

I suppose the real problem is that people think that marijuana is a drug. Sure it has psycho-active effects but is it a drug? I don’t think so.

Ask A Tween

Dated: 14 Jul 2009
Posted by Tanya

realmario

This is the first part in what will probably be a one-part series that I am calling “Ask a Tween”. It just occurred to me that we adults love to make pronouncements on what is acceptable for kids. Should we let twelve year olds supervise other children at the mall? Are video games appropriate for kids? What do they like?

Take this review of games marketed to girls aged eight to twelve years old on Wired. The author ponders whether kids are sent the right messages by video games. Will girls become flaky, silly, stupid, shallow and vacuous if they play a video game about high school cliques? Is this as bad as letting young boys play Grand Theft Auto? Is marketing video games especially to girls a good idea? Let’s ask a tween!

Katy says, after reading the Wired review, “They all look pretty stupid and what the site said was pretty funny. They were all about makeup and high school cliques and crap like that. I’d never buy any of them. The video games I like to play are !!!!!MARIO!!!!!!! :D

So there you have it. All those games are stupid and Katy won’t beg me to buy them any time ever. Meanwhile, we will play Paper Mario. We borrowed a copy of Mario Galaxy from Katy’s friend and we have also played Mario Cart. It seems that collecting coins, jumping on shrooms, throwing rocks, solving puzzles and flying through the air having adventures are fun for everybody. Making Peach, the frilly Pink Princess, a character in Mario that is playable doesn’t hurt either. Katy always chooses the Princess Peach character when we play Mariocart.

Are you listening video game manufacturers? My advice won’t cost you a thing and it’s foolproof. Boys and girls aren’t all that different when it comes to video games.

Is TV advertising sexist?

Dated: 13 Jul 2009
Posted by Tanya

Not only is it sexist but it’s mind-rotting trash. But this clip made me lol.

The Wagging Finger of Shame

Dated: 12 Jul 2009
Posted by Tanya

I happened across another story about a parent being shamed and judged for giving their kids just the slightest little bit of freedom. Bridget Kevane got a mighty smackdown from the law when she decided to allow her twelve year old child to supervise some other kids while at the law. I encourage you to go to the link and read the entire thing as told by Bridget. But long story short, it came to the attention of the mall cop that the children were not being properly supervised by a parental unit. He decided to make an issue out of it, and pressed charges against her for endangering the welfare of her children.

Just think! Twelve year olds babysitting younger kids! Would you like to know what I was doing when I was twelve years old, besides baby-sitting? On occasion my mother would leave in charge of a small town restaurant for a few hours. I had to serve customers food and run a till all by myself. Do I feel like I endured child abuse? Of course not. Being given responsibility as a child is a sure way to know that your parents trust you. After all, that is what self-esteem is based upon, being able to be trusted with responsibility.

What really kills me about this story is the response of the so-called progressive bloggers that wrote about this story. I saw it on Pandagon, a blog I am usually very fond of. Unfortunately, Jesse fell for the same kind of parental shaming that is so abundant in our STRANGE NEW WORLD! He calls her an asshole and proceeds to go on and on about how bad what she did was. But I am still wondering if he thinks that mall cop over-reacted or not. Is this mother really someone that needs to be charged and waste a lot of the courts’ time? I think not. The mall cop could have satisfied himself with a pompous lecture about what a bad parent she is (people love to disparage your parenting talents, especially if they are non-parents) and went on his merry way. That would have been the reasonable thing to do, rather than put this poor woman through the legal ringer.

I have always given my children plenty of leash and plenty of responsibility to go along with it. When my oldest child was about seven or eight years old, I allowed her to walk herself home from school and let herself into the house and wait for me to come home. She would be home alone for almost a whole hour sometimes! Amazing, I know. This took place after she begged me for months and her baby-sitter told me I should let her stay home alone. I finally relented and worried (for nothing). The child was fine and I would be greeted with a hearty “Why are you home so early?”. Apparently, being home without parental supervision is kind of exciting when you are eight years old. Who would have thunk it, eh?

At least Pandagon isn’t the only perspective on this mess. I just love what the Free Range Kid blog had to say about this outrageous story. Thank you so much for existing, Free Range Kid blog! Here is another take on our collective epidemic of over-parenting.

Of course, I come from rural Saskatchewan. I have family members that live an hour away from Saskatoon on the farm that would never dream of locking their doors. I remember when some cousins from the city would visit and the “Why are you locking the door?” debates would begin. We country kids would be annoyed by the city kids locking the doors because none of us have house keys. There is no need for them when you live out of town. People feel safe. But the city kids just could not comprehend leaving the house without locking it. That idea would blow their little minds. Unfortunately, I am a city kid now and I could never sleep without a locked door again, despite the fact that a locked door is a pretty false sense of security. I guess there are some advantages to rural Saskatchewan after all.

Morning Cuteness

Dated: 1 Jul 2009
Posted by Tanya

It’s pretty hard to watch this video without going “AWWWWW!”.